Tag Archives: Feminism

A Few Links

Good things seen on the web recently.

1.
You should read this excellent essay by Kameron Hurley on the depiction of women in media and in history lessons, and its effect on cultural perceptions. And also llamas.

So you forget the llamas that don’t fit the narrative you saw in films, books, television – the ones you heard about in the stories – and you remember the ones that exhibited the behavior the stories talk about. Suddenly, all the llamas you remember fit the narrative you see and hear every day from those around you. You make jokes about it with your friends. You feel like you’ve won something. You’re not crazy. You think just like everyone else.

2.
io9 has posted a very funny FAQ that tears apart the many, many plot holes in Star Trek Into Darkness. I saw the film a bit over a week ago, and while I did enjoy it, I can’t help but agree with the points made here. Note: Spoils the entire film.

3.
And in fiction, I recently read this excerpt from the novel Rupetta by Nike Sulway, posted on Weird Fiction Review: The Miracle of Consciousness. It has easily convinced me to buy the full novel. Check it out.

Link Post

So here are some links I saved of things I’ve seen online over the last week or so.

First up, when I read Stepan Chapman’s The Troika back in November I mentioned how it’s a shame the book’s so hard to find; Jeff VanderMeer helpfully showed up in the comments to say they’d be publishing it as an ebook soon. Well, soon is now: The Troika is now available in ebook form. I was lucky enough to get a hard copy for Christmas a few years back (my parents tracked it down from some online seller in Germany, I believe), but people have been missing out on this excellent Philip K. Dick Award-winning surreal novel while it has been out of print. Go get it!
*

Over on his blog, John Scalzi talked about how his book Redshirts got to be a New York Times bestseller – and why it isn’t an example for how any writer can have a bestseller.
*

Be sure to check out these great posts on writing female characters:
- Alex Dally MacFarlane wants to see more realistic female friendships in fiction, and
- Rose Lemberg follows up with what makes a good feminist character – and how overuse of the “Warrior Woman” archetype can be ultimately harmful.
*

Here’s a link for book lovers that is strangely captivating: Bookshelf Porn (safe for work!). Enjoy.
*

On the other end of the scale, however, is Buzzfeed’s 25 Depressing Portraits of Closed Bookstores. The book selling business is being hit from a lot of sides: Online purchasing, ebooks, the financial crisis, and the general decline of the high street. A few of these images struck quite a chord.
*

As if we needed reminding there is still hate and bigotry in the world, we have these responses when Oreo decided to show support for gay pride with a picture of a rainbow-coloured cookie. We still have a long way to go.
*

Monday’s edition of webcomic a softer world seems appropriate at this point.
*

In case those last few links were a little too depressing, I’ll leave you with this.

Pay Attention. This Stuff Matters.

A few weeks ago I wrote about Feminist Frequency, the web video series by Anita Sarkeesian, and her (still ongoing) Kickstarter project to fund a series on “Tropes vs. Women in Video Games”. Since then, it turns out a whole shitstorm of harrassment and Wikipedia vandalism has been stirred up around the project (at least partly driven by those geniuses at 4chan).

Anita gives a sample of the harrassment in Youtube comments and talks about the Wikipedia vandalism campaign here and here.

I caught myself about to type “it goes without saying that this stuff is just terrible”. But then I thought about that for half a second. No, it doesn’t go without saying. If it went without saying, this wouldn’t be happening, so I’ll say it:

This is terrible. No one should be treated like this.

And we need to keep saying it until people start to get it into their heads, and stop being hateful, racist, homophobic, misogynistic assholes.

Anita has also been sharing some of the media response to the hate campaign on her @FemFreq Twitter feed, and they’re worth reading (though, as always, watch out for the comments. Especially on Kotaku) -

  • Becky Chambers at TheMarySue sums up the whole situation better than I could (and offers some suggestions on what to do about online harrassment, in short: don’t sit there and take it, SPEAK UP):

    Whether or not you like Sarkeesian’s work is utterly moot. You might disagree with some of her points. You might disagree with all of her points. You might even vehemently disagree. That’s not the issue here. The issue lies in this: A woman declared her intent to publicly voice her opinions about video games. For that, she was called a bitch, a whore, a slut, a cunt, a dyke, and a baffling assortment of racial slurs. She was threatened with violence, rape, and death. She was told to shut her mouth, get back in the kitchen, and die of cancer. Her video was repeatedly flagged for terrorism in an effort to get YouTube to pull it. Her Wikipedia page was defaced with pornography and profanity. All for the crime of being a woman talking about women in video games. No, not for being a woman talking about video games. For being a woman who had announced that she would, at some point in the future, be talking about video games.

  • Alex at The Border House on “This Week in Harrassment” (again: SPEAK UP!)
  • Helen Lewis at the New Statesman: “Dear The Internet, This Is Why You Can’t Have Anything Nice”
  • And finally Kotaku, along the same lines while demonstrating the problem itself pretty well in the comments. (Par for the course for comments on Kotaku.)
  •  
    UPDATE: It seems the attackers have now taken http://www.feministfrequency.com offline.

    Several Things Make A Thing

    One:
    The 2011 Nebula Awards were presented yesterday. Jo Walton takes home the Best Novel prize for Among Others. Locus Online has the full list.

    Two:
    Everyone on the internet has seen it by now, but John Scalzi’s post on privilege, Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is, has been making waves all over. A few of the things to see are Scalzi’s own follow-up, and:

    And, well, a helluva lot of other places online that are talking about it. Really, there’s not much you can do about privilege, directly, but just making people aware that it is there is important.

    Three:
    Shortly before I went off on holiday I was introduced to Feminist Frequency, an online video series by feminist pop culture media critic Anita Sarkeesian. The videos discuss issues of women and gender in popular culture; much of this is in relation to television shows and film, but her videos on the subject of gender in children’s toy advertising are a must see.

    Anita is currently fundraising for a follow-up to her Tropes vs. Women video series of last year, which looked at a small selection of frequently used female stereotypes in pop culture. The new series will tackle Tropes Vs. Women in Video Games, and there has already been a massive influx of support.

    Four:
    And continuing in the same vein, Jef Smith is currently running a Kickstarter for a feminist speculative fiction anthology, to be edited by Ann and Jeff VanderMeer, the couple behind many previous anthologies including The New Weird, Steampunk Reloaded, and the mammoth effort The Weird: A Compendium of Strange and Dark Stories. The people behind this know what they’re about, and I have no doubt this will turn out to be an excellent anthology once it is done.

    Five:
    On my own end, I remain a voracious consumer without much to give back. I’ve spent the last few weeks, excepting the trip overseas, watching the entire series of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, a show I’ve seen a lot of before but never in full and in correct sequence.

    I saw The Avengers while in Toronto, and can’t say much more than most other people do:  It is a very good superhero movie, possibly the best, but not much more than that. It doesn’t try to be more than that. It could easily have been as big a mess as X-Men 3, given the number of characters that had to be juggled; I have to credit Joss Whedon for that.

    In books, I read Ursula Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness while I was away. It’s an excellent novel, both for its narrative and for the way in addresses issues of gender identity: the Gethenian people in the novel’s setting do not have male and female genders, but instead become sexually active in either role for a few days each month, and are asexual the rest of the time. It provokes questions of just how strongly our civilisation is shaped by the gender binary.

    At home, I have been reading The Essential Dykes to Watch Out For, a collected edition of Alison Bechdel’s long-running comic. Apart from being engaging on the level of its narrative, humour, and the social/political commentary, it also provides an interesting window into 20 years of lesbian subculture for someone who has no personal experience or connection with it such as myself.

    Six:
    Finally, last week I went and created a Twitter account. I’ve not really started using it yet, but I have started following a few people. I’m trying out linking up the blog to the twitter feed to see how that works. Not sure where I’ll go with it yet.

    She Wants Revenge and Ludovico Conti

    I first heard of She Wants Revenge when Elizabeth Bear posted one of their music videos on her livejournal. As the commenters there discussed, and as I found when I listened through more of their work, the lyrics of a She Wants Revenge song often tend to be simultaneously romantic and disturbing. They’re driven heavily by the male gaze, the one-sided perspective of a man toward a woman, and there lingers in the background a question of whether the other party feels the same.

    I’ve been thinking about this lately because of a song that came up on random, which brought to mind a link to the novel I’d just finished reading, Catherynne Valente’s Palimpsest. The song, “Not Just A Girl”, is one of their more straightforward ones, but still that ambiguous perspective lurks within the lyrics: You’re not just a girl/You’re more like the air and sea/I want you so desperately/And nothing’s going to keep us apart. On the surface of things, it’s the lyrics of an ordinary love song, and perhaps in this case nothing else is intended by it. But within the context of She Wants Revenge’s other songs, I can’t help but look deeper into it.

    It is the third line of the chorus that takes this out of the romantic and firmly into the blinkered world of the male gaze: The focus switches from the “you” of the rest of the song, to an “I” – the want, the need, is his alone, and because of this, the next line becomes entirely about his desires and not those of the girl he sings about. “Nothing’s going to keep us apart,” he tells her – not even, perhaps, her refusal? In his adoration he raises her up beyond “just a girl” and into something primal, something inhuman, and something he ultimately defines only in terms of himself.

    The link with Palimpsest comes through a character in the novel, Ludovico Conti, a bookbinder whose wife, Lucia, walks out on him after her discovery of the city of the novel’s title. From that point forward, he seeks her out, desperate to bring her back home, unable to understand why she would have left. But the reasons are there from the beginning, when the reader experiences his perception of her.

    Ludovico understands the world in terms of animals. Infatuated with the Etymologiae of St. Isidore, and particularly, it seems, with his cataloguing of animals, he views the women in his life in those terms – Lucia is “his chimera, his composite beast, his snarling, biting thing”. When she scorns his habits, when she shows anger and frustration, he puts it down to this animal nature he has ascribed to her.

    Not only does Ludovico dehumanise his wife with his romantic vision of her, but it is suffused with a possessiveness – she is his chimera – which appears ultimately to have driven Lucia away. Her first response to his appearance before her in Palimpsest: “This is mine. You can’t have it. Please.” In Palimpsest – a city reached in dreams, explored through sex – she thought she had found one thing in her world that he could not lay claim to.

    “…to have a thing I didn’t have to share with you was rich and sweet. I was spread out under you so far and so thin, nothing of me was my own.” Lucia looks at her empty cup. “It is so beautiful and awful here, so much more real… well, more real than you. Than the story you told about us. This is my place, now, it’s not yours, it’s not. You have the world, this is mine.” Her voice had grown high and panicked, as if he were preparing to steal something from her.

    Lucia is scornful toward Ludovico, but it is clear this scorn has come from her realisation of how stifling his view of her had been. It is one of my favourite scenes in the novel, Lucia’s emotional rejection of Ludovico’s romantic quest ringing so true against the background of his perspective through the novel until that point.

    “Give me back eight years of huddling for warmth in a cave of your making. Give me the dress I wore in Ostia, and my cigarette case with the cockatrice on it. Give me everything in me that was stamped out by everything in you. Give me back a girl who had never heard of a chimera, who had never read that stupid encyclopaedia, who had never had to hear herself called an animal. Then I’ll come home.”

    Ludovico had done nothing malicious. He had not deliberately belittled Lucia, debased her. But by romanticising his wife in the form of an animal, he reduces her to an object, and robs her of agency. Like the narrating voice in “Not Just a Girl”, without realising he is doing it, he defines her only in terms of himself.

    Recently, a lot of the buzz among SFF-related blogs and news sites was about a post by writer Christopher Priest where he criticised the current shortlist for the Clarke Awards.

    Too much has been said about it already to bother weighing in myself, but the whole episode prompted Catherynne Valente to think about how very different reactions would have been if a woman had written the same things. In her post Let Me Tell You About the Birds and the Bees: Gender and the Fallout Over Christopher Priest, she makes some excellent points on the big disparity that still exists in the way people react to men and women online.

    Yes, I know it’s the net and comments are a festering pile of venom, but you do have to notice that the venom cranks up to eleven when a woman posts. You can tell me well, Requires is so mean! Sady doesn’t say things super nicely! And I will point to all the men who say not nice things, some of whom even call out properties for sexism, and are applauded for their badassery and edginess, for their disinclination to suffer fools, and the total lack of screeching hate speech in their comments.

    The fact is, to be a woman online is to eventually be threatened with rape and death. On a long enough timeline, the chances of this not occurring drop to zero.

    It’s worth reading; this is a real problem that you see everywhere online.

    Bad Romance

    I came across this video via Kate Beaton’s (of Hark! A Vagrant) tumblr page. Thought it was clever and worth sharing.